Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
How blaming 'slash and burn' farmers is deforesting mainland Southeast Asia
|Title:||How blaming 'slash and burn' farmers is deforesting mainland Southeast Asia|
|LC Subject Headings:||Deforestation - Southeast Asia|
Shifting cultivation - Southeast Asia
|Publisher:||Honolulu: East-West Center|
|Series/Report no.:||AsiaPacific issues ; no. 47|
|Abstract:||For decades, international lenders, agencies, and foundations as well as national and local governments have spent millions of dollars trying to modernize the traditional practices of farmers in many mountainous areas of Southeast Asia-an agenda driven by the belief that their age-old shifting cultivation practices (known pejoratively as slash and burn ) are deforesting Asia. But a new look at how forests fare under shifting cultivation (as opposed to under permanent agriculture) clearly demonstrates that efforts to eliminate the ancient practice have actually contributed to deforestation, loss of biodiversity, and reduction in carbon storage. In fact, shifting cultivation, rather than being the hobgoblin of tropical forest conservation, may be ecologically appropriate, culturally suitable, and under certain circumstances the best means for preserving biodiversity in the region. The real threat to these tropical forests is posed by the steady advance of large-scale permanent and commercial agriculture.|
|Description:||For more about the East-West Center, see http://www.eastwestcenter.org/|
|Appears in Collections:||AsiaPacific Issues|
Please email firstname.lastname@example.org if you need this content in an ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.