Collaboration Ecosystems
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/10125/107402
Browse
Recent Submissions
Item type: Item , Problems and Potentials of Shared Manufacturing in the Context of Industrial Ecosystems: A Bibliometric Analysis(2024-01-03) Stuckmann-Blumenstein, Patrick; Bons, Dominik; Große, Nick; Benkhoff, LanaShared Manufacturing has emerged as a transformative paradigm in the manufacturing industry that can potentially disrupt the sector. In particular, the formation of ecosystems could serve as an incubator for sharing approaches. New business models linked to demand-based resource allocation could increase the manufacturer’s competitiveness and can even help to achieve sustainability goals. While sharing approaches have already emerged in some sectors, the impact on manufacturing has been inhibited so far. This bibliometric analysis aims to provide a high-level overview of the research landscape on hurdles and potentials related to Shared Manufacturing in ecosystems. The findings provide researchers with entry points for a problem-centered approach to the topic, serving as an initial starting point for a more in-depth work and examination. In this way, further research can address the challenges and liberate the full potential of Shared Manufacturing.Item type: Item , Enabling Value Co-Creation in Partner Collaboration Ecosystems: An Institutional Work Perspective(2024-01-03) Elo, Jenny; Lumivalo, Juuli; Tuunanen, Tuure; Vargo, StephenThis study integrates service-dominant logic and institutional theory to develop a conceptual framework that delineates how institutional work can be leveraged to enable value co-creation within partner collaboration ecosystems. We contribute to research and practice by highlighting the importance of institutions (i.e., rules, norms, meanings, symbols, and similar aides to collaboration) and institutional arrangements (i.e., interdependent assemblages of institutions) as coordination mechanisms for value co-creation in partner collaboration ecosystems and by proposing how actors can purposively shape these arrangements to achieve value co-creative collaborations.Item type: Item , A Multi-level Collaboration Process for Developing Relationships and Creating Value in an Entrepreneurship Ecosystem(2024-01-03) Sebesta, John; Akaka, MelissaThis paper explores how collaboration in entrepreneurship ecosystems is driven by individual and collective efforts to reach both common and private goals. We investigate how the collaboration roles of a university support efforts to create value and help shape the network of relationships that scaffold the ecosystem. We propose a multi-level collaboration process that reflects how micro-level positions and practices feed into meso-level outcomes. In turn, these outcomes support the collaboration roles a university plays in developing relationships within an entrepreneurship ecosystem. Based on this framework, we discuss the integration of technology in supporting internal positions and practices, as well as collaboration roles. Our research contributes to the understanding of collaboration as a multi-level process, in which meso-level outcomes that are rooted in micro-level positions and practices ultimately support macro-level collaboration roles that establish a network of relationships and contribute to value creation across the entrepreneurship ecosystem.Item type: Item , Understanding the Review Bombing Phenomenon in Movies and Television(2024-01-03) Schuff, David; Mudambi, Susan; Wang , Mei-XianReview bombing, where users post many negative reviews to lower a product’s rating, is a phenomenon that has become an increasingly prevalent problem in the entertainment industry and garnered significant attention in the popular press. These reviews are characterized by inflammatory language over a social, cultural, or political issue related to the product, and are less about the quality of the product itself. Using a dataset of 3232 reviews from Metacritic.com, we find evidence that review-bombed products have a high expert/user score gap, high review polarity, high negative imbalance, and evidence of collective action, compared with a paired set of non-bombed products. Specifically, we find evidence of collective trolling, as bombed product reviews are 20% shorter, but have 83% more negative emotion, 25% more anger, and 130% more controversial words. We provide several avenues for future research on review bombing.Item type: Item , Introduction to the Minitrack on Collaboration Ecosystems(2024-01-03) Akaka, Melissa; Schau, Hope; Vargo, Stephen