A PEDAGOGICAL APPROACH TO IMPROVING STUDENTS’ USE OF METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES
Date
2019
Authors
Contributor
Advisor
Department
Instructor
Depositor
Speaker
Researcher
Consultant
Interviewer
Narrator
Transcriber
Annotator
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Volume
Number/Issue
Starting Page
Ending Page
Alternative Title
Abstract
ABSTRACT
In higher education, there has been a push to strengthen students’ critical thinking skills. Metacognition is a central component of critical thinking and research has indicated that students who use metacognitive strategies tend to become better critical thinkers and academically successful students. Though the merits of metacognition are known, relatively less research has been conducted on the effectiveness of pedagogical practices intended to improve students’ metacognitive skills and abilities. The overarching agenda guiding this study is to contribute to research that improves students’ critical thinking; the specific focus is on the effectiveness of metacognitive pedagogy on students’ self-reported use of metacognitive strategies. In a quasi-experimental two-group research design, 392 undergraduate students received metacognitive pedagogy and worked with metacognitive strategies while completing a 16-week undergraduate course in sexuality studies. Students in Group A received metacognitive pedagogy and learning for a total of ten weeks, whereas students in Group B received metacognitive pedagogy and learning for a total of five weeks. Throughout both semesters, data about students’ self-reported use of metacognitive strategies were collected using the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI; Schraw & Dennison, 1994) on four occasions, two before and two after the pedagogy was introduced. To examine the effects of metacognitive pedagogy on students’ self-reported use of metacognitive strategies, I analyzed changes in students’ regulation and knowledge scores from the MAI using latent growth curve modeling. The results revealed a statistically significant change in students’ metacognitive strategies pertaining to regulation of cognition, whereas with knowledge of cognition, the pattern of change did not support the hypothesized growth. In addition, the amount of exposure to metacognitive pedagogy did not have an effect on students’ use of metacognitive strategies. The findings suggest that metacognitive pedagogy can have a positive effect on students’ regulation of cognition but little if any effect on students’ knowledge of cognition. Furthermore, more exposure does not appear to result in higher gains, though the study was constrained within a single semester and unable to measure durability or delayed changes in either regulation or cognition.
Description
Keywords
Educational psychology, Sexuality, Critical thinking, Latent growth curve modeling,, Metacognition, Metacognitive Awareness Inventory, Metacognitive pedagogy, Sexuality education
Citation
Extent
159 pages
Format
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
Related To (URI)
Table of Contents
Rights
All UHM dissertations and theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.
Rights Holder
Local Contexts
Collections
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.