PURSUING A RECONSTRUCTIVE PRESIDENCY: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE BARACK OBAMA PRESIDENCY

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorChadwick, Richard W.
dc.contributor.authorZierak, Stephen Joseph
dc.contributor.departmentPolitical Science
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-26T20:13:57Z
dc.date.available2024-02-26T20:13:57Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.degreePh.D.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10125/107891
dc.subjectPolitical science
dc.subjectBarack Obama
dc.subjectpolitical time
dc.subjectreconstructive presidents
dc.titlePURSUING A RECONSTRUCTIVE PRESIDENCY: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE BARACK OBAMA PRESIDENCY
dc.typeThesis
dcterms.abstractABSTRACTWas Barack Obama a transformational president? This study addresses that question through an elaborated version of Stephen Skowronek’s regime theory in political time, which serves as a useful lens in determining opportunity for a “reconstructive” presidency; and through comparison of the Obama presidency to five previous reconstructive presidencies. Skowronek’s presidency typology asserts linkage between disjunction and reconstruction, and the ubiquitous existence of a dominant political regime. This study demonstrates that both disjunctions and reconstructions can occur outside the frame of one presidency; and that a disjunctive presidency need not be followed by a reconstructive presidency, but rather can be followed by a competitive period of no dominant regime. Political time is a constraint, not a determinant, where contingency is an important consideration. Also, an opportune political time must be supplemented by a president’s will and skill in managing a dominant regime change and in creating a reconstructive politics. Relevant presidential skills demonstrated by successful reconstructive presidents include repudiating the corruption of the outgoing regime; communicating a mid-level reform message in simple, abbreviated terms to relevant publics (including the public-at-large); tying policy reforms to past values for purposes of legitimacy; setting effective agenda priorities and achieving early signature “wins;” and leading and expanding the party. A review of President Obama’s skills in each of these areas show weaknesses in the domestic realm that made a durable reconstruction impossible for him. Even in foreign policy, where presidents have more unilateral authority, and where Obama was more successful in communicating his foreign policy objectives, foreign policy failures, and lack of Congressional support concerning major foreign policy accomplishments, made his policy reforms transitory rather than durable. This study demonstrates that Barack Obama had reconstructive opportunity, transformational will, but lacked the requisite skills to implement a presidential reconstruction.
dcterms.extent498 pages
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.publisherUniversity of Hawai'i at Manoa
dcterms.rightsAll UHM dissertations and theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.
dcterms.typeText
local.identifier.alturihttp://dissertations.umi.com/hawii:11955

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Zierak_hawii_0085A_11955.pdf
Size:
2.36 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Ph.D. - Political Science