PURSUING A RECONSTRUCTIVE PRESIDENCY: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE BARACK OBAMA PRESIDENCY
Date
2023
Authors
Contributor
Advisor
Department
Instructor
Depositor
Speaker
Researcher
Consultant
Interviewer
Narrator
Transcriber
Annotator
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Volume
Number/Issue
Starting Page
Ending Page
Alternative Title
Abstract
ABSTRACTWas Barack Obama a transformational president? This study addresses that question through an elaborated version of Stephen Skowronek’s regime theory in political time, which serves as a useful lens in determining opportunity for a “reconstructive” presidency; and through comparison of the Obama presidency to five previous reconstructive presidencies. Skowronek’s presidency typology asserts linkage between disjunction and reconstruction, and the ubiquitous existence of a dominant political regime. This study demonstrates that both disjunctions and reconstructions can occur outside the frame of one presidency; and that a disjunctive presidency need not be followed by a reconstructive presidency, but rather can be followed by a competitive period of no dominant regime. Political time is a constraint, not a determinant, where contingency is an important consideration. Also, an opportune political time must be supplemented by a president’s will and skill in managing a dominant regime change and in creating a reconstructive politics. Relevant presidential skills demonstrated by successful reconstructive presidents include repudiating the corruption of the outgoing regime; communicating a mid-level reform message in simple, abbreviated terms to relevant publics (including the public-at-large); tying policy reforms to past values for purposes of legitimacy; setting effective agenda priorities and achieving early signature “wins;” and leading and expanding the party. A review of President Obama’s skills in each of these areas show weaknesses in the domestic realm that made a durable reconstruction impossible for him. Even in foreign policy, where presidents have more unilateral authority, and where Obama was more successful in communicating his foreign policy objectives, foreign policy failures, and lack of Congressional support concerning major foreign policy accomplishments, made his policy reforms transitory rather than durable. This study demonstrates that Barack Obama had reconstructive opportunity, transformational will, but lacked the requisite skills to implement a presidential reconstruction.
Description
Keywords
Political science, Barack Obama, political time, reconstructive presidents
Citation
Extent
498 pages
Format
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
Related To (URI)
Table of Contents
Rights
All UHM dissertations and theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.
Rights Holder
Local Contexts
Collections
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.