The Newbery Award: Committtee Procedures and Public Reaction Ino, Sharon en_US
dc.contributor.department Education en_US 2014-01-15T19:29:43Z 2014-01-15T19:29:43Z 2014-01-15 en_US
dc.description.abstract In the summer of 1969, I enrolled in a children's literature course, Ed CI 319, under Dr. Mary E. Reddin. After a discussion about the Newbery Award, as one unit of study, the class was assigned to read a Newbery Award book and a runner-up of a particular year and do a comparative study of included of these two books. The guide questions posed by the instructor included the following: 1) Do you feel that these books were of literary merit? What are the individual strengths and weaknesses of these books? 2) Do you feel that the Award should have been given to the book that won the award? Or, do you feel that the runner-up deserved the award? Why? The purposes of this assignment were to have the students engage in critical analyses of books for children and to employ criteria by which children's books could be reviewed, evaluated, and judged. I chose to do my comparative study of books that received Newbery honors during 1959. The two books selected were The Witch of Blackbird Pond by Elizabeth George Speare and The Family Under the Bridge by Natalie Savage Carlson. en_US
dc.format.extent vi, 98 pages en_US
dc.publisher University of Hawaii at Manoa en_US
dc.rights All UHM Honors Projects are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner. en_US
dc.title The Newbery Award: Committtee Procedures and Public Reaction en_US
dc.type Term Project en_US
dc.type.dcmi Text en_US
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
4.15 MB
Adobe Portable Document Format