On Establishing Underlying Tonal Contrast
Date
2014-12
Authors
Contributor
Advisor
Department
Instructor
Depositor
Speaker
Researcher
Consultant
Interviewer
Narrator
Transcriber
Annotator
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Hawai'i Press
Volume
8
Number/Issue
Starting Page
707
Ending Page
737
Alternative Title
Abstract
Phonological field work is largely about establishing contrast in comparable environments.
The notion of phonological contrast, however, can be confusing, particularly in its application to tone analysis. Does it mean phonemic contrast in the structuralist sense, or
does it mean underlying contrast in the generative sense? Many linguists, in publications
otherwise written from a generative perspective, support underlying tonal contrasts with
minimal pairs and other data that are based on structuralist criteria. This paper critiques
how tonal contrast is often supported in the literature and demonstrates that many supposed minimal pairs are invalid from a generative perspective. It further demonstrates that
because many morphemes in tone languages consist solely of floating tones, the potential
for these cannot be ignored when establishing comparable phonological environments.
*This paper is in the series How to Study a Tone Language, edited by Steven Bird and Larry Hyman
Description
Keywords
Citation
Snider, Keith. 2014. On Establishing Underlying Tonal Contrast. Language Documentation & Conservation 8: 707—737
Extent
Format
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
Related To (URI)
Table of Contents
Rights
Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License
Rights Holder
Local Contexts
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.