Peer-reviewed Brainstorming to Facilitate Large Group Collaboration

dc.contributor.authorHelquist, Joel
dc.contributor.authorKruse, John
dc.contributor.authorDiller, Christopher
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-29T00:21:02Z
dc.date.available2016-12-29T00:21:02Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-04
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the impact of peer-reviewed brainstorming on the quality of brainstorming ideas. Peer-reviewed brainstorming aims to improve the quality of the brainstorming ideas and reduce the number of noisy comments. A pilot study was conducted that compared traditional, free brainstorming to a peer-reviewed brainstorming process, which requires each idea to be reviewed and edited by peers. The peer-review process did reduce the number of low quality ideas. This process was also rated higher in satisfaction ratings than traditional brainstorming.
dc.format.extent9 pages
dc.identifier.doi10.24251/HICSS.2017.085
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-9981331-0-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10125/41234
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectbrainstorm
dc.subjectpeer-review
dc.subjectquality
dc.subjectgroup support systems
dc.titlePeer-reviewed Brainstorming to Facilitate Large Group Collaboration
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.type.dcmiText

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
paper0085.pdf
Size:
1.25 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format