Peer-reviewed Brainstorming to Facilitate Large Group Collaboration Helquist, Joel Kruse, John Diller, Christopher 2016-12-29T00:21:02Z 2016-12-29T00:21:02Z 2017-01-04
dc.description.abstract This paper examines the impact of peer-reviewed brainstorming on the quality of brainstorming ideas. Peer-reviewed brainstorming aims to improve the quality of the brainstorming ideas and reduce the number of noisy comments. A pilot study was conducted that compared traditional, free brainstorming to a peer-reviewed brainstorming process, which requires each idea to be reviewed and edited by peers. The peer-review process did reduce the number of low quality ideas. This process was also rated higher in satisfaction ratings than traditional brainstorming.
dc.format.extent 9 pages
dc.identifier.doi 10.24251/HICSS.2017.085
dc.identifier.isbn 978-0-9981331-0-2
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.subject brainstorm
dc.subject peer-review
dc.subject quality
dc.subject group support systems
dc.title Peer-reviewed Brainstorming to Facilitate Large Group Collaboration
dc.type Conference Paper
dc.type.dcmi Text
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
1.25 MB
Adobe Portable Document Format