Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Comparison of the BodyGem, Harris Benedict prediction equation, and a metabolic cart on resting energy expenditure

File Description SizeFormat 
M.S.Q111.H3_4122 DEC 2006_r.pdfVersion for non-UH users. Copying/Printing is not permitted2.68 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
M.S.Q111.H3_4122 DEC 2006_uh.pdfVersion for UH users2.68 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Item Summary

Title: Comparison of the BodyGem, Harris Benedict prediction equation, and a metabolic cart on resting energy expenditure
Authors: Go, Kurt C.L.
Keywords: Metabolism -- Measurement
Issue Date: 2006
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of resting energy expenditure (REE) via indirect calorimetry using the BodyGem with measurements from a metabolic cart and the Harris-Benedict equation. Participants were 25 women (12) and men (13) aged 21-39 years who were tested on one occasion. Results indicated mean REE (kcal•day-I) for the metabolic cart, BodyGem, and Harris-Benedict equation were 1,321. 7, 1,280.5, and 1,609.7 kcal•d-1, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were significant ranging from r=0.64 to r=0.98 for weight, height, and body mass index compared to REE measurements. There was a significant difference in mean REE between the metabolic cart and Harris-Benedict equation, but no significant difference between the BodyGem and the metabolic cart. Therefore, it was concluded that the BodyGem provided an accurate method to measure REE and the Harris-Benedict equation should not be used if other methods are available.
Description: Thesis (M.S.)--University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2006.
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 50-53).
vii, 85 leaves, bound ill. 29 cm
Rights: All UHM dissertations and theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.
Appears in Collections:M.S. - Kinesiology and Leisure Science

Please contact if you need this content in an alternative format.

Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.