GPT in the Loop: Evidence from the Field.

Date
2024-01-03
Authors
Yang, Cathy
Allen, Leo
Restrepo-Amariles, David
Troussel, Aurore
Contributor
Advisor
Department
Instructor
Depositor
Speaker
Researcher
Consultant
Interviewer
Annotator
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Volume
Number/Issue
Starting Page
4343
Ending Page
Alternative Title
Abstract
Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs) are highly effective in generating content and increasing productivity, but companies have reservations about their use in a professional setting. OpenAI and policymakers suggest that disclosing the use of GPT is necessary, but there is little empirical evidence to understand its consequence. Our experiment found that managers from a leading consulting firm were unable to distinguish Human-GPT generated content when the content generation source was not disclosed and disclosing the use of GPT improved the content's evaluation. We explored the effects of applying the GPT disclosure policy in the workplace. Managers prefer analysts to disclose their use of GPT, but their preferences regarding how junior analysts should use GPT may differ from that of the analysts, leading to potential conflicts over disclosure.
Description
Keywords
Economic and Societal Impacts of Technology, Data, and Algorithms, content evaluation, experiment, gpt disclosure, human-gpt collaboration
Citation
Extent
10 pages
Format
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
Proceedings of the 57th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
Table of Contents
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Rights Holder
Local Contexts
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.