Does the Threat of Takeover Discipline Managers? New Evidence from the Foreign Investment and National Security Act
Does the Threat of Takeover Discipline Managers? New Evidence from the Foreign Investment and National Security Act
Date
2017-08-25
Authors
Godsell, David
Contributor
Advisor
Department
Instructor
Depositor
Speaker
Researcher
Consultant
Interviewer
Annotator
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Volume
Number/Issue
Starting Page
Ending Page
Alternative Title
Abstract
Competing theories and mixed results describe the effect of the takeover market on managers’ earnings management incentives. I use the passage of the Foreign Investment and National Security Act (FINSA), which suppressed foreign investment in a subset of U.S. industries, to re-examine this relationship. I find that, after FINSA implementation, FINSA-affected firms record more income-increasing discretionary accruals. Firms that were more likely to be subject to takeover before FINSA drive this effect. This inference is robust to a wide variety of empirical specifications and discretionary accrual measures as well as to the use of firm fixed effects, model-free measures of earnings management and multiple placebo tests. Overall, these results suggest that a weaker market for corporate control accentuates earnings management.
Description
Inquiries about this document can be made to HARC@hawaii.edu
Keywords
protectionist laws,
economic nationalism,
earnings management
Citation
Extent
Format
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
Table of Contents
Rights
Rights Holder
Local Contexts
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.