Does the Threat of Takeover Discipline Managers? New Evidence from the Foreign Investment and National Security Act

Date
2017-08-25
Authors
Godsell, David
Contributor
Advisor
Department
Instructor
Depositor
Speaker
Researcher
Consultant
Interviewer
Annotator
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Volume
Number/Issue
Starting Page
Ending Page
Alternative Title
Abstract
Competing theories and mixed results describe the effect of the takeover market on managers’ earnings management incentives. I use the passage of the Foreign Investment and National Security Act (FINSA), which suppressed foreign investment in a subset of U.S. industries, to re-examine this relationship. I find that, after FINSA implementation, FINSA-affected firms record more income-increasing discretionary accruals. Firms that were more likely to be subject to takeover before FINSA drive this effect. This inference is robust to a wide variety of empirical specifications and discretionary accrual measures as well as to the use of firm fixed effects, model-free measures of earnings management and multiple placebo tests. Overall, these results suggest that a weaker market for corporate control accentuates earnings management.
Description
Inquiries about this document can be made to HARC@hawaii.edu
Keywords
protectionist laws, economic nationalism, earnings management
Citation
Extent
Format
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
Table of Contents
Rights
Rights Holder
Local Contexts
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.