Which Reward Should I Choose? Preliminary Evidence for the Middle-Option Bias in Reward-Based Crowdfunding

dc.contributor.authorSimons, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorWeinmann, Markus
dc.contributor.authorTietz, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorvom Brocke, Jan
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-29T01:38:36Z
dc.date.available2016-12-29T01:38:36Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-04
dc.description.abstractCrowdfunding has become an important research area, but we know little about how rewards influence fundraising success. This research-in-progress studies reward-based crowdfunding through a behavioral-economics lens. We draw on dual-process theory and provide preliminary evidence for the middle-option bias in crowdfunding. Two empirical studies in a simple, controlled environment confirm the significance of the middle-option bias, both for varying numbers of donation options and for varying price ranges. Since our findings suggest that the positioning of rewards in a menu of rewards can influence support behavior and how much money project creators collect, they can inform the design of crowdfunding projects. Our future research will develop a mock crowdfunding website to study the middle-option bias in a more realistic environment.
dc.format.extent10 pages
dc.identifier.doi10.24251/HICSS.2017.526
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-9981331-0-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10125/41687
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectCrowdfunding
dc.subjectDual-process theory
dc.subjectMiddle-option bias
dc.subjectRewards
dc.titleWhich Reward Should I Choose? Preliminary Evidence for the Middle-Option Bias in Reward-Based Crowdfunding
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.type.dcmiText

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
paper0538.pdf
Size:
682.06 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format