Just Friends? Managers’ Connections to Judges

Date
2021
Authors
Huang, Sterling
Roychowdhury, Sugata
Sletten, Ewa
Xu, Yanping
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Volume
Number/Issue
Starting Page
Ending Page
Alternative Title
Abstract
Abstract: We study the impact of social connections between judges and executives on the outcomes of Securities Class Action Litigation (SCAL). Judges who share a social network with a firm’s executives are more likely to dismiss lawsuits against the firm. These connected cases are also resolved much faster and settled for significantly lower amounts. The favorable outcomes cannot be explained by the lower severity of connected cases, or by court, judge, or firm characteristics. Our results are robust to using new judge appointments as a source of exogenous variation in “connectedness”. The expectation of more favorable litigation outcomes has an ex ante effect on connected managers’ disclosure decisions. Connected managers issue more voluntary forecasts that walk up prevailing earnings expectations, particularly over the long term and also those that walk them down over the short term. Our evidence indicates that social connections influence judge impartiality and meaningfully alter litigation outcomes, as well as managers’ disclosure decisions.
Description
Keywords
social connections, litigation, disclosure, management forecasts
Citation
Extent
Format
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
Rights
Rights Holder
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.