Reasonable Accommodation and Information Accessibility by Various Formats the Difference Between Braille, Sign Language, and Speech Format

dc.contributor.affiliation Matsuzaki, Yoshimi: Department of International & Cultural Studies and Inclusive Education Support Division, Tsuda University
dc.contributor.affiliation Hamamatsu, Wakaba: Graduate School of International & Cultural Studies and Inclusive Education Support Division, Tsuda University
dc.contributor.affiliation Shibata, Kuniomi: Department of International & Cultural Studies and Inclusive Education Support Division, Tsuda University
dc.contributor.author Matsuzaki, Yoshimi
dc.contributor.author Hamamatsu, Wakaba
dc.contributor.author Shibata, Kuniomi
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-31T17:00:53Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-31T17:00:53Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10125/69340
dc.subject Information Accessibility
dc.subject Reading Accessibility
dc.subject Higher Education
dc.subject Means of Transmission
dc.title Reasonable Accommodation and Information Accessibility by Various Formats the Difference Between Braille, Sign Language, and Speech Format
dc.type Conference Paper
dc.type.local Research/Theory Focus
dcterms.abstract Information accessibility for persons with visual disabilities is the transformation into text data, braille or speech format. For persons with hearing disabilities, information accessibility includes closed-captioning, notetaking, and sign language translation services. Although such methods are standard and essential, this paper will discuss possible differences in comprehensibility between these various formats. We designed a research project, ‘Reasonable Accommodations of Reading Accessibility (RARA),’ to evaluate the consistency of academic quality in braille, sign language, and speech formats. First, we will focus on the features of the Japanese language, because these features could possibly affect the differences in the understanding among each means of conveying. Second, we introduce two concepts, Basic Interpersonal Communicative Skills (BICS) and Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency (CALP), as key factors in our research project. Third, we will discuss the outcomes of interviews from 2018 that targeted each two users of braille and of sign language. The outcomes suggested mainly about unique ways of understanding content in various means of transmission. Finally, we will outline the present phase of the RARA project.
dcterms.extent 15 pages
dcterms.language English
dcterms.publisher Center on Disability Studies, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
dcterms.rights Creative Commons License: CC-BY
dcterms.rightsholder Center on Disability Studies, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
dcterms.type Text
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Reasonable_Accommodation_and_Information_Accessibility_by_Various_Formats_the_Difference_Between_Braille_Sign_Language_and_Speech_Format_Matsuzaki.pdf
Size:
496.2 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Reasonable_Accommodation_and_Information_Accessibility_by_Various_Formats_the_Difference_Between_Braille_Sign_Language_and_Speech_Format_Matsuzaki.txt
Size:
41.4 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Reasonable_Accommodation_and_Information_Accessibility_by_Various_Formats_the_Difference_Between_Braille_Sign_Language_and_Speech_Format_Matsuzaki.docx
Size:
228.43 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description: