Consistently Revealing the Inconsistencies: The Construction of Fear in the Criminal Law

dc.contributor.author Camille A. Nelson
dc.date.accessioned 2020-09-30T17:28:10Z
dc.date.available 2020-09-30T17:28:10Z
dc.date.issued 2004
dc.description.abstract For purposes of this essay, I will focus upon my attempts to have Criminal Law students problematize the criminal law reasonable person. For illustrative purposes, I will focus upon two areas in the criminal law, rape and self-defense, in which the inconsistency, if not the irrationality, of the use of the reasonable person reveals the undercurrents of negative associations of both gender and racial identity constructs.
dc.format.extent 23 pages
dc.identifier.citation Camille A. Nelson, Consistently Revealing the Inconsistencies: The Construction of Fear in the Criminal Law, 48 St. Louis U. L.J. 1261 (2004).
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10125/69990
dc.language.iso English
dc.publisher Saint Louis University Law Journal
dc.relation.ispartofseries Camille Nelson
dc.title Consistently Revealing the Inconsistencies: The Construction of Fear in the Criminal Law
dc.type Article
dc.type.dcmi Text
prism.endingpage 1283
prism.startingpage 1261
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
48StLouisULJ.pdf
Size:
1012.49 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: