Consistently Revealing the Inconsistencies: The Construction of Fear in the Criminal Law

dc.contributor.authorCamille A. Nelson
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T17:28:10Z
dc.date.available2020-09-30T17:28:10Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.description.abstractFor purposes of this essay, I will focus upon my attempts to have Criminal Law students problematize the criminal law reasonable person. For illustrative purposes, I will focus upon two areas in the criminal law, rape and self-defense, in which the inconsistency, if not the irrationality, of the use of the reasonable person reveals the undercurrents of negative associations of both gender and racial identity constructs.
dc.format.extent23 pages
dc.identifier.citationCamille A. Nelson, Consistently Revealing the Inconsistencies: The Construction of Fear in the Criminal Law, 48 St. Louis U. L.J. 1261 (2004).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10125/69990
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherSaint Louis University Law Journal
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCamille Nelson
dc.titleConsistently Revealing the Inconsistencies: The Construction of Fear in the Criminal Law
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.dcmiText
prism.endingpage1283
prism.startingpage1261

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
48StLouisULJ.pdf
Size:
1012.49 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format