Just Because We Can, Doesn’t Mean We Should: Algorithm Aversion as a Principled Resistance
Files
Date
2024-01-03
Authors
Contributor
Advisor
Department
Instructor
Depositor
Speaker
Researcher
Consultant
Interviewer
Narrator
Transcriber
Annotator
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Volume
Number/Issue
Starting Page
6076
Ending Page
Alternative Title
Abstract
This paper problematizes the literature on the non-use of algorithmic decision-making systems (ADMS), commonly examined as algorithm aversion. Whilst prior literature attributes algorithm aversion primarily to human bias and irrationality, assuming utility-based evaluations, we argue that it may also stem from values-based evaluations of technology, which are overlooked. Through an integrated ethical analysis, drawing upon the “big three” ethical theories of consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics, we examine implicit normative judgments within the algorithm aversion literature. Consequently, we positively reframe algorithm aversion as a potentially principled resistance to ADMS, expanding prior views of the phenomenon. We argue that such resistance may be constructive and lead to a better alignment of ADMS with societal needs and values. Thus, we call on IS scholars to explore this phenomenon as an ethical and sociotechnical issue, rather than as a costly problem to be mitigated, as prior literature might suggest.
Description
Keywords
Dark Sides of Digitalization, algorithm aversion, critical literature review, ethical analysis, non-use, values
Citation
Extent
10 pages
Format
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
Proceedings of the 57th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
Related To (URI)
Table of Contents
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Rights Holder
Local Contexts
Collections
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.