Microzooplankton Grazing Impact on Phytoplankton After a Storm in Kaneo‘he Bay, O‘ahu
Microzooplankton Grazing Impact on Phytoplankton After a Storm in Kaneo‘he Bay, O‘ahu
Date
2012
Authors
Kolker, Galiel
Contributor
Advisor
Selph, Karen
Department
Oceanography
Global Environmental Science
Global Environmental Science
Instructor
Depositor
Speaker
Researcher
Consultant
Interviewer
Annotator
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Volume
Number/Issue
Starting Page
Ending Page
Alternative Title
Abstract
A relatively new area of research has developed over the past 30 years, that of the
microbial food web and the grazing dynamics therein. Microzooplankton (the 20-200 µm
size category including copepod nauplii, ciliates, and flagellates) are the principal grazers
of phytoplankton. Nanoplankton (2-20 µm) were also included in this study, since they
are known to graze picoplankton (0.2-2 µm), the smallest phytoplankton in the microbial
food web. Our research focused on the effects the presence or absence of nutrients had on
the composition of phytoplankton and grazers in water samples taken in South Kaneohe
Bay, near Coconut Island. We sampled storm (KBG1) and non-storm conditions (KBG2),
artificially supplementing some samples with nutrients. We used Landry and Hassett’s
(1982) dilution technique to achieve the desired fraction of whole seawater to filtered
seawater, and hence the desired dilution of grazers. We calculated the net phytoplankton
growth in storm versus non-storm, in all dilution factors, and with varying additions of
nutrients. We observed net phytoplankton growth rates (which includes mortality by
microzooplankton) was higher the more diluted (and fewer grazers) there were in our
water samples. The doubling rates of phytoplankton growth during storm conditions
(KBG1) were largely unaffected by the artificial addition of nutrients, since growth
conditions were already optimal due to nutrient loading from input streams following a
storm (for example, Prochlorococcus doubled abundance in 12.7 hours with added
nutrients versus an 11.6-hour doubling rate without added nutrients). For storm
conditions, an average of 83% of phytoplankton growth was consumed by grazers, and so
net phytoplankton growth was positive. In contrast, the doubling rates were greatly
affected by artificial nutrient additions during nutrient-depleted non-storm conditions
(KBG2). Non-storm samples with artificially added nutrients had doubling rates of 2-4x
faster (for example, Prochlorococcus doubled in abundance in 24.0 hours) than nonstorm samples without added nutrients (Prochlorococcus doubled in 44.8 hours). For
non-storm conditions, grazers consumed an average of 112% of phytoplankton growth,
making net phytoplankton growth negative. Our findings agreed with the prior research;
that is, non-storm conditions were dominated by the smaller cells, such as Synechococcus
sp. (0.2-2 µm), and storm conditions were dominated by the larger cells such as chainforming centric diatoms Chaetoceros sp.
Description
Keywords
microbiology,
plankton,
phytoplankton
Citation
Extent
74 pages
Format
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
Table of Contents
Rights
All UHM dissertations and theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.
Rights Holder
Local Contexts
Collections
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.