Recovering Ergativity in Heritage Samoan
Date
2018-05
Authors
Contributor
Advisor
Department
Instructor
Depositor
Speaker
Researcher
Consultant
Interviewer
Narrator
Transcriber
Annotator
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Hawaii at Manoa
Volume
Number/Issue
Starting Page
Ending Page
Alternative Title
Abstract
The unique language profile of a heritage speaker offers an ideal opportunity to investigate the persistence of specific linguistic systems in the face of language shift (i.e. reduced input). Ergativity, the morphosyntactic system of alignment that sets A (the subject of a transitive verb) apart from O (the object of a transitive verb) and S (the sole argument of an intransitive verb), has been shown to be a fragile linguistic feature particularly sensitive to changes in language input, as it is often late acquired by children (Ochs 1982, Bavin & Stoll 2013), and lacking in heritage grammar (Schmidt 1985; Montrul et al. 2012). This dissertation investigates whether ergativity persists in the grammar of Samoan heritage speakers in spite of the abrupt shift in language input during early childhood (i.e. from Samoan to English, an accusative language). Samoan, a relatively understudied language, exhibits a robust system of ergativity at both the morphological (i.e. case, agreement) and syntactic level (i.e. relative clauses, wh-questions, quantifier float) (Mosel & Hovdhaugen 1992). Four experiments were carried out investigating the production and grammaticality judgement of key ergative features in declaratives, wh-questions, and relative clauses in three distinct speaker groups: native, heritage, and L2. The findings from this dissertation suggest that ergativity in Samoan is indeed a fragile system particularly susceptible to decreased language input. However, in spite of an initial lack of ergativity in heritage grammar, key ergative features were recovered through targeted linguistic intervention (i.e. explicit modeling, recasting). The results demonstrate that heritage speakers were able to recover an underlying pattern of ergativity (i.e. extending ergative features to structures not included in the intervention), while L2 speakers were only able to acquire construction-specific features. These findings lend support for the Permanence Hypothesis (Brenner 2010, cited in Benmamoun, Montrul, Polinsky 2013), that is, linguistic knowledge acquired during critical periods of language acquisition persists throughout life.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Extent
Format
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
Related To (URI)
Table of Contents
Rights
Rights Holder
Local Contexts
Collections
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.