Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10125/69782
The relationship between reading proficiency and vocabulary size: An empirical investigation
File | Size | Format | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
2018 04.pdf | 850.34 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Item Summary
Title: | The relationship between reading proficiency and vocabulary size: An empirical investigation |
Authors: | Hacking, Jane F. Rubio, Fernando Tschirner, Erwin |
Date Issued: | 01 Jan 2018 |
Publisher: | Cengage |
Citation: | Hacking, J.F., Rubio, F., Tschirner, E. (2018). The relationship between reading proficiency and vocabulary size: An empirical investigation. The American Association of University Supervisors, Coordinators and Directors of Foreign Languages Programs (AAUSC), 58-77. http://hdl.handle.net/102015/69782 |
Abstract: | Studies of the vocabulary size needed to be a proficient second-language reader commonly arrive at numbers that are staggering. The figures most often cited are between 8,000 and 9,000 words, as required for reading novels and newspaper articles with sufficient ease and understanding (Nation, 2006). To date, almost all of the empirical research on reading proficiency and vocabulary size has focused on English, but two recent studies (Hacking & Tschirner, 2017; Hacking, Tschirner, & Rubio, in press) reported lexical minimums associated with particular American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL) reading proficiency levels. This chapter builds on these data and examines the relationship between the reading proficiency and vocabulary knowledge of L2 learners of German, Russian, and Spanish. It addresses the following research questions: (1) How well does reading proficiency as defined by ACTFL predict vocabulary size measured as the receptive knowledge of various bands of the most frequent 5,000 words in German, Russian, and Spanish? (2) What vocabulary sizes are predicted by ACTFL reading proficiency levels? (3) Do German, Russian, and Spanish differ with respect to the relationship between reading proficiency and vocabulary size? This chapter will also focus on some implications for curriculum development. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10125/69782 |
Volume: | 2018 |
Appears in Collections: |
2018 UNDERSTANDING VOCABULARY LEARNING AND TEACHING: IMPLICATIONS FOR LANGUAGE PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT |
Please email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.