ScholarSpace will be down for maintenance on Thursday (8/16) at 8am HST (6pm UTC)
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

The Not-So Rosy Periwinkle: Political Dimensions of Medicinal Plant Research

File SizeFormat 
I1547-3465-03-295.pdf357.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Full Item Record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHarper, Janiceen_US
dc.identifier.citationHarper J. 2005. The not-so rosy periwinkle: political dimensions of medicinal plant research. Ethnobotany Research & Applications 3:295-308.en_US
dc.description.abstractAs pharmaceutical companies and conservation groups increasingly recognize the biomedical and economic potential of indigenous medicines from tropical rainforests, romanticized stereotypes of rainforest medicines as inherently beneficial abound. These ideas fail to take into consideration the question of why those living in the rainforest need medicines, and whether or not “traditional” medicines are a “choice” to those who do not have access to pharmaceutical medicines. This paper presents a theoretical analysis of how the study and practice of commodifying indigenous medicines has tended to exclude the structural factors shaping their use in indigenous communities, drawing on 14 months’ ethnographic research on access to medicines near the Ranomafana National Park in southeastern Madagascar. I suggest that researchers and practitioners of conservation and development consider the ways in which “modernizing” tropical rainforest communities shapes patterns of health and illness unevenly, thereby contributing to changing medical “traditions.”en_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Hawaii at Manoaen_US
dc.titleThe Not-So Rosy Periwinkle: Political Dimensions of Medicinal Plant Researchen_US
Appears in Collections:2005 - Volume 3 : Ethnobotany Research and Applications

Please email if you need this content in an ADA-compliant format.

Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.