Soifer, Aviam
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Recent Submissions
Item Item In Memoriam: The Many Sides of Hugh C. Macgill(2022) Pomp, Richard; Wiesbrod, Carol; Newmyer, Kent; Mann, Bruce H.; Kay, Richard; Soifer, Avi; Fisher, TimothyItem Presidential Election Reform: A Current National Imperative(2022) Soifer, Aviam; Bohnhorst, Mark; Morrow, Kate E.; Hundt, ReedItem Gaping Gaps in the History of the Independent State Legislature Doctrine: McPherson v. Blacker, Usurpation, and the Right of the People to Choose Their President(2023) Bohnhorst, Mark; Fitzgerald, Michael; Soifer, AviamItem Descent(2001) Soifer, AviamItem The Disability Term: Dignity, Default, and Negative Capability(2000) Soifer, AviamItem Remembrance, Group Gripes, and Legal Frictions: Rule of Law or Awful Lore?(2022) Soifer, AviamItem The Task of Hearing What Has Already Been Said: History and Native American Legal Claims(Israel Yearbook of Human Rights, 1993) Soifer, AviamThis essay considers several recent invocations of history by American judges. It does so in the context of Native American legal claims,' but its point about the demands and abuse of history has broader implications. My argument is that each of three distinct judicial approaches to the past exemplified by these decisions is seriously flawed. Taken together, however, these cases underscore how claims purportedly derived from history can become a powerful whipsaw. As we will see, these recent decisions employ history inconsistently, yet with devastating effectiveness, against Indian claims. They demonstrate how commonplace it is for judges to make claims based on history, while blithely remaining blind to the crucial understandings at the confluence of memory, meaning and historical accuracy.