Meaning, Reference, and Reification in the Definition of a Security

dc.contributor.authorChang, Williamson B.C.
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-23T21:27:52Z
dc.date.available2015-03-23T21:27:52Z
dc.date.issued1986
dc.description.abstractAmong the most critical problems in securities regulation is determining what constitutes a "security." The Supreme Court has never positively identified the essential features of a security. If the Court ever arrives at a comprehensive definition, its decision will affect many corporations and major economic transactions. In this Article, Professor Chang develops a comprehensive, yet relatively simple model that defines security for the purposes of federal regulation and reconciles the Court's major securities decisions. The Article also provides insight into the use of language, describes the implications of "open-ended" legislative intent, and offers a framework with which to view the dialectic process of common lawmaking as a consistent evolution of standards.
dc.format.extent58
dc.identifier.citation19 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 403 1985-1986
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10125/35642
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUniversity of California, Davis Law Review, Volume 19
dc.subjectSecurities
dc.subjectSecurities Terminology
dc.titleMeaning, Reference, and Reification in the Definition of a Security

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Chang_19UCDavisLRev403.pdf
Size:
3.13 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format