On the Need for Random Baseline Comparisons in Metaheuristic Search

dc.contributor.authorSoper, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-28T00:46:49Z
dc.date.available2017-12-28T00:46:49Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-03
dc.description.abstractA wide variety of organizations now regularly rely on established metaheuristic search algorithms in order to find solutions to otherwise intractable optimization problems. Unfortunately, neither the developers of these algorithms nor the organizations that rely on them typically assess the algorithms’ performance against a baseline random search strategy, opting instead to compare a specific algorithm’s performance against that of other metaheuristic search algorithms. This paper reveals the folly of such behavior, and shows by means of an optimization case study that simple random or nearly random search algorithms can, in certain circumstances, substantially outperform several of the most widely used metaheuristic search algorithms in finding solutions to optimization problems. The implications of the observed results for both organizations and researchers are presented and discussed.
dc.format.extent10 pages
dc.identifier.doi10.24251/HICSS.2018.158
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-9981331-1-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10125/50045
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectIntelligent Decision Support for Logistics and Supply Chain Management
dc.subjectMetaheuristic search, Optimization, Random search
dc.titleOn the Need for Random Baseline Comparisons in Metaheuristic Search
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.type.dcmiText

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
paper0158.pdf
Size:
469.5 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format