Conversational Agent as a Black Hat: Can Criticising Improve Idea Generation?
Files
Date
2023-01-03
Contributor
Advisor
Department
Instructor
Depositor
Speaker
Researcher
Consultant
Interviewer
Narrator
Transcriber
Annotator
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Volume
Number/Issue
Starting Page
185
Ending Page
Alternative Title
Abstract
The Ideate phase of Design Thinking is the source of many idea creations. In this context, criticism is considered a creativity killer, yet recent studies show that criticism can be beneficial. An example of this is the black hat of one creativity method: Six Thinking Hats. It points out the weaknesses of an idea so that they are eliminated by further refining. Previous research shows that conversational agents have an advantage over humans when criticizing because of their perceived neutrality. To investigate this, we developed and implemented a conversational agent and evaluated it using an A/B test. The results of the study show that the prototype is perceived as less neutral when it criticizes. Criticizing by the conversational agent can lead to higher quality ideas. This work contributes to a better understanding of conversational agents in the black hat role as well as of their neutrality.
Description
Keywords
AI and the Future of Work, conversational agents; idea generation; human-ai collaboration
Citation
Extent
11
Format
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
Proceedings of the 56th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
Related To (URI)
Table of Contents
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Rights Holder
Local Contexts
Collections
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.