Case-marking of Core Arguments and Syntactic Alignment in Old Japanese

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorIannucci, David J.
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-13T01:58:10Z
dc.date.available2021-01-13T01:58:10Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-01
dc.description.abstractAbstract In recent years, a theory has gained currency according to which Old Japanese, the oldest attested an.cestor of the modern Japanese language, exhibited a split system of syntactic alignment: active-stative in nominalized clauses (most of them subordinate), and nominative-accusative (the default) elsewhere. I attempt to show that the evidence and arguments offered in support of this theory are entirely insufficient to establish its authenticity.1
dc.identifier.citationIannucci, David J. 2016. Case-marking of Core Arguments and Syntactic Alignment in Old Japanese. University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Working Papers in Linguistics 47(1).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10125/73261
dc.publisherUniversity of Hawai'i at Mānoa Department of Linguistics
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUniversity of Hawai‘I at Mānoa Working Papers in Linguistics
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License
dc.subjectlinguistics
dc.titleCase-marking of Core Arguments and Syntactic Alignment in Old Japanese
prism.volume2016

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
wp-iannucci.pdf
Size:
177.33 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Working Papers in Linguistics - 2016