A survey of current reproducibility practices in linguistics publications

dc.contributor.author Gawne, Lauren
dc.contributor.author Berez-Kroeker, Andrea L.
dc.contributor.author Kelly, Barbara
dc.contributor.author Heston, Tyler
dc.date.accessioned 2017-01-12T20:37:21Z
dc.date.available 2017-01-12T20:37:21Z
dc.date.issued 2017-01-06
dc.description Poster: In order to move forward toward reproducible research in linguistics, we first need to know where we are now with regard to our practices for methodological clarity and data citation in publications. In this poster we share the results of a study of over 370 journal articles, dissertations, and grammars, which is taken as a sample of current practices in the field. The publications all come from a ten-year span. The journals were selected for broad coverage. Grammars included published grammars and dissertations written as grammars, with broad geographic coverage, both in terms of subject language and publisher or university.These publications are critiqued on the basis of transparency of data source, data collection methods, analysis, and storage. While we find examples of transparent reporting, most of the surveyed research does not include key metadata, methodological information, or citations that are resolvable to the data on which the analyses are based.
dc.description.abstract In order to move forward toward reproducible research in linguistics, we first need to know where we are now with regard to our practices for methodological clarity and data citation in publications. In this poster we share the results of a study of over 370 journal articles, dissertations, and grammars, which is taken as a sample of current practices in the field. The publications all come from a ten-year span. The journals were selected for broad coverage. Grammars included published grammars and dissertations written as grammars, with broad geographic coverage, both in terms of subject language and publisher or university.These publications are critiqued on the basis of transparency of data source, data collection methods, analysis, and storage. While we find examples of transparent reporting, most of the surveyed research does not include key metadata, methodological information, or citations that are resolvable to the data on which the analyses are based.
dc.description.sponsorship This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant SMA-1447886.
dc.format.extent 1
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10125/43567
dc.language.iso en-US
dc.rights Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
dc.subject data citation
dc.subject attribution
dc.subject Linguistics
dc.title A survey of current reproducibility practices in linguistics publications
dc.type Conference Paper
dc.type Presentation
dc.type.dcmi StillImage
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Poster_Gawne_Berez-Kroeker_Kelly_Heston.pdf
Size:
2.13 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: