Negligible Effect of Density on Coral Survivorship and Implications for Reef Restoration
Date
2022
Authors
Contributor
Advisor
Department
Instructor
Depositor
Speaker
Researcher
Consultant
Interviewer
Narrator
Transcriber
Annotator
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Volume
Number/Issue
Starting Page
Ending Page
Alternative Title
Abstract
Coral reefs and the ecosystem functions and services they provide are
increasingly threatened by anthropogenic stressors. To counter these stressors, active reef
restoration has become the emerging tool for reef scientists and managers to counteract
coral loss at local scales. Currently, restoration focuses mostly on out planting corals in
attempts to increase coverage and diversity to historical levels. However, there is only a
basic understanding of the optimal sizes and densities of outplants that should be used for
effective reef restoration. For instance, colony survivorship tends to be strongly
associated with size. Thus, we believe that colonies grow fastest at low densities, where
density-dependent processes like competition and disease are minimal. In this study, I use
a meta-analysis and a field study to quantify the influence of coral density (or crowding)
on colony survival. For the meta-analysis, I extracted data on the density and
survivorship of corals from studies that measured both variables. For the field study, I
used previously published data for 11 species from an eight-year demography study at
Lizard Island on the Great Barrier Reef. For both data sets, I was able to quantify the
relationship between density (individuals per meter) and survivorship (chance of
surviving one year) by fitting linear models. For the field study, I was also able to include
growth morphology (or growth form) as a covariate, which is traditionally thought to
have a key effect on survivorship as density increases (i.e., some species are better
competitors for space based on their shapes). However, I found that density had a
negligible impact on coral survival in both sets of analyses, despite densities of up to 30
colonies per meter square and 100% crowding in the meta-analysis and field study,
respectively. However, survivorship was indeed strongly related to growth form, where
robust massive forms tended to survive better than branching and tabular forms. These
results suggest that competition for space is not a key driver of survival, and that other
factors such as mechanical vulnerability override density processes. I ran into several
issues with the meta-analysis that limited the amount of data I could analyze. For
example, population density was reported in a range of different and incompatible ways,
including as coral cover, which cannot reveal the difference between a single large
colony and multiple smaller colonies. I therefore suggest that future efforts that measure
coral cover should also include population density to improve data synthesis for meta-
analysis. Overall, my work suggests that restoration initiatives should outplant colonies at
sizes that optimize survivorship, which differ among species, and that outplant densities
have little effect on survival rates.
Description
Keywords
coral reefs, climate change, reef restoration
Citation
Extent
51 pages
Format
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
Related To (URI)
Table of Contents
Rights
All UHM dissertations and theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.
Rights Holder
Rutenberg, Mariya
Local Contexts
Collections
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.