Using corpus linguistics to examine the extrapolation inference in the validity argument for a high-stakes speaking assessment

dc.contributor.author LaFlair, Geoffrey T.
dc.contributor.author Staples, Shelley
dc.date.accessioned 2018-05-09T01:18:06Z
dc.date.available 2018-05-09T01:18:06Z
dc.date.issued 2017-09-19
dc.description.abstract Investigations of the validity of a number of high-stakes language assessments are conducted using an argument-based approach, which requires evidence for inferences that are critical to score interpretation (Chapelle, Enright, & Jamieson, 2008b; Kane, 2013). The current study investigates the extrapolation inference for a high-stakes test of spoken English, the Michigan English Language Assessment Battery (MELAB) speaking task. This inference requires evidence that supports the inferential step from observations of what test takers can do on an assessment to what they can do in the target domain (Chapelle et al., 2008b; Kane, 2013). Typically, the extrapolation inference has been supported by evidence from a criterion measure of language ability. This study proposes an additional empirical method, namely corpus-based register analysis (Biber & Conrad, 2009), which provides a quantitative framework for examining the linguistic relationship between performance assessments and the domains to which their scores are extrapolated. This approach extends Bachman and Palmer’s (2010) focus on the target language use (TLU) domain analysis in their study of assessment use arguments by providing a quantitative approach for the study of language. We first explain the connections between corpus-based register analysis and TLU analysis. Second, an investigation of the MELAB speaking task compares the language of test-taker responses to the language of academic, professional, and conversational spoken registers, or TLU domains. Additionally, the language features at different performance levels within the MELAB speaking task are investigated to determine the relationship between test takers’ scores and their language use in the task. Following previous studies using corpus-based register analysis, we conduct a multi-dimensional (MD) analysis for our investigation. The comparison of the language features from the MELAB with the language of TLU domains revealed that support for the extrapolation inference varies across dimensions of language use. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship CaMLA Spaan Research Grant Program en_US
dc.format.extent 43 en_US
dc.identifier.citation LaFlair, G. T., & Staples, S. (2017). Using corpus linguistics to examine the extrapolation inference in the validity argument for a high-stakes speaking assessment. Language Testing. 34(4), 451-475 en_US
dc.identifier.doi http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0265532217713951
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10125/56004
dc.language.iso en-US en_US
dc.publisher Sage Journals en_US
dc.rights This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ en_US
dc.subject corpus linguistics en_US
dc.subject domain analysis en_US
dc.subject multi-dimensional analysis en_US
dc.subject performance assessment en_US
dc.subject register analysis en_US
dc.subject validity argument en_US
dc.title Using corpus linguistics to examine the extrapolation inference in the validity argument for a high-stakes speaking assessment en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.type.dcmi Text en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
LaFlair_Staples(2017)_post-print-ss.pdf
Size:
468.86 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: