Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/77047

How Does Accountability and Role Drive Valuation Specialists’ Determination of Fair Value?

File Size Format  
HARC-2022 paper 349.pdf 617.8 kB Adobe PDF View/Open

Item Summary

Title:How Does Accountability and Role Drive Valuation Specialists’ Determination of Fair Value?
Authors:Barr-Pulliam, Dereck
Joe, Jennifer
Mason, Stephani
Sanderson, Kerri-Ann
Keywords:valuation specialists
audit quality
financial reporting quality
qualitative research
fair value measurements
Date Issued:2021
Abstract:We interview valuation specialists (specialists) employed by accounting firms (in North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region) to understand how their felt accountability to internal (auditors) vs. external clients (managers) influence the estimation and financial reporting and audit quality of complex financial instruments reported in audited financial statements. Specialists are integral to determining the fair values reported in audited financial statements because managers and auditors lack the necessary skill to do so and seek specialists’ assistance to fulfill their financial reporting responsibilities. Thus, the same specialists, at different times, act as either preparers (helping managers estimate fair values) or evaluators, supporting auditors’ assessments of their client’s fair value estimates. Our interviews reveal that differences across the specialists’ roles activate different types of felt accountability to managers and auditors. These felt accountability differences can result in lower commitment to ensure the adequacy of the specialist’s scope of services when evaluating versus preparing fair estimates. Specialists also exploit the subjectivity in fair value estimates to support balances that meet management’s preferences and complete valuations that avoid material audit differences. Importantly, such specialists’ behaviors and the consequences of their actions impact the amount of the fair values reported in financial statements yet are unobservable. Thus, financial statement users do not have access to potential bias existing in the estimates.
URI:http://hdl.handle.net/10125/77047
Appears in Collections: 01 Auditing (AUD)


Please email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.

Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.