Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

The Role of New York Times Picks in Comment Quality and Engagement

File Size Format  
0286.pdf 898.89 kB Adobe PDF View/Open

Item Summary

Title:The Role of New York Times Picks in Comment Quality and Engagement
Authors:Wang, Yixue
Diakopoulos, Nicholas
Keywords:Mediated Conversation
comment quality
computational communication
online civility
online communities
Date Issued:05 Jan 2021
Abstract:While various methods can be used to maintain online discussion quality, one aspect that is underexplored is the role of highlights from professional moderators. In this work, we look at the impact of New York Times (NYT) Picks. We present an analysis of more than 13 million NYT comments, examining the quality and frequency of commenting on the site in response to NYT Picks. The findings offer evidence that NYT Picks are associated with an increase in the quality of first-time receivers’ next approved comment, as well as the commenting frequency during commenters’ early tenure on the site. The quality boost associated with receiving a Pick attenuates after subsequent picks and diminishes over time as the user continues commenting, but is still higher than commenters who don’t receive Picks. The findings also indicate that exposure to Pick badges is positively correlated with subsequent higher quality approved comments, albeit to a lesser extent.
Pages/Duration:10 pages
Rights:Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Appears in Collections: Mediated Conversation

Please email if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons