Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/50487

Crowdsourcing Privacy Design Critique: An Empirical Evaluation of Framing Effects

File SizeFormat 
paper0600.pdf1.18 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Item Summary

Title: Crowdsourcing Privacy Design Critique: An Empirical Evaluation of Framing Effects
Authors: Ayalon, Oshrat
Toch, Eran
Keywords: Information Security and Privacy
Crowdsourcing, Decision-making, Design-critique, Personas, Privacy
Issue Date: 03 Jan 2018
Abstract: When designed incorrectly, information systems can thwart people’s expectations of privacy. An emerging technique for evaluating systems during the development stage is the crowdsourcing design critique, in which design evaluations are sourced using crowdsourcing platforms. However, we know that information framing has a serious effect on decision-making and can steer design critiques in one way or another. We investigate how the framing of design cases can influence the outcomes of privacy design critiques. Specifically, we test whether -˜Personas’, a central User-Centered Design tool for describing users, can inspire empathy in users while criticizing privacy designs. In an experiment on Amazon Mechanical Turk workers (n=456), we show that describing design cases by using personas causes intrusive designs to be criticized more harshly. We discuss how our results can be used to enhance privacy-by-design processes and encourage user-centered privacy engineering.
Pages/Duration: 10 pages
URI/DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/50487
ISBN: 978-0-9981331-1-9
DOI: 10.24251/HICSS.2018.598
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Information Security and Privacy


Please contact sspace@hawaii.edu if you need this content in an ADA compliant alternative format.

Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.