ScholarSpace will be down for maintenance on Thursday (8/16) at 8am HST (6pm UTC)
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Compensation and the Melanesian State: Why the Kwaio Keep Claiming
|Title:||Compensation and the Melanesian State: Why the Kwaio Keep Claiming|
show 2 moreSolomon Islands
|LC Subject Headings:||Oceania -- Periodicals.|
|Publisher:||University of Hawai'i Press|
Center for Pacific Islands Studies
|Citation:||Akin, D. 1999. Compensation and the Melanesian State: Why the Kwaio Keep Claiming. The Contemporary Pacific 11 (1): 35-67.|
|Abstract:||As Melanesian countries enter their third decade of independence, diverse local|
communities are seeking to transform their status in relation to the state. Many
are attempting to frame their interactions with government in terms of indigenous
cultural models that presume social equivalence. When thus applied, these
models themselves acquire new meanings. This paper explores this process in
relation to ideas about compensation among Malaitans in the Solomon Islands
who have since independence pressed several claims against the central government.
The focus is on a series of claims made by Kwaio people, beginning in the
1980s, regarding crimes of a 1927 punitive expedition that followed the assassination
of a district officer and his party. Ethnographic, historical, and political
analyses are combined to explain why Kwaio find this compensation demand
such an appealing way to approach the government. The case also illuminates
violent compensation riots that rocked the capital, Honiara, in 1989 and 1996.
|Appears in Collections:||TCP [The Contemporary Pacific], 1999 - Volume 11, Number 1|
Please email firstname.lastname@example.org if you need this content in an ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.