Helquist, JoelKruse, JohnDiller, Christopher2016-12-292016-12-292017-01-04978-0-9981331-0-2http://hdl.handle.net/10125/41234This paper examines the impact of peer-reviewed brainstorming on the quality of brainstorming ideas. Peer-reviewed brainstorming aims to improve the quality of the brainstorming ideas and reduce the number of noisy comments. A pilot study was conducted that compared traditional, free brainstorming to a peer-reviewed brainstorming process, which requires each idea to be reviewed and edited by peers. The peer-review process did reduce the number of low quality ideas. This process was also rated higher in satisfaction ratings than traditional brainstorming.9 pagesengAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalbrainstormpeer-reviewqualitygroup support systemsConference Paper10.24251/HICSS.2017.085