Effect of Rejoingers in Production Questionnaires

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Contributor

Instructor

Depositor

Speaker

Researcher

Consultant

Interviewer

Interviewee

Narrator

Transcriber

Annotator

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Volume

Number/Issue

Starting Page

Ending Page

Alternative Title

Abstract

Compared to the many interlanguage pragmatics studies based on pe data, there are few which examine the extent to which pe responses are actually valid representations of naturally occuning qpeech. It does not take much comparative research to ascertain that, as far as discoursal aspects of linguistic action are concerned (conversational management, sequencing of linguistic action in developing exchanges, collaborative activity, turn-taking, backchanneling), the conshuct validity of PQs is necessarily very low: such discourse{evel phenomena do not show up in one-tum responses. However, the strategies and linguistic forms used in speech act performance--the conventions of means and form of linguistic action under given contextual conditions-are believed to be adequately represented in pe responses. Is this indeed the case? Given the widespread use of PQs, validation studies are urgently needed. In this paper, we shall first review the comparative studies available to date, and then report on a recent study.

Description

Keywords

Citation

DOI

Extent

23 pages

Format

Geographic Location

Time Period

Related To

University of Hawai'i Working Papers in English as a Second Language 13(1)

Related To (URI)

Table of Contents

Rights

Rights Holder

Catalog Record

Local Contexts

Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.