Indo-Pacific Minilateralism and Strategic Competition (I): Australia/Japan and Chinese Approaches Compared
Loading...
Date
Contributor
Advisor
Department
Instructor
Depositor
Speaker
Researcher
Consultant
Interviewer
Interviewee
Narrator
Transcriber
Annotator
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
East-West Center
Volume
Number/Issue
Starting Page
Ending Page
Alternative Title
Abstract
Description
This paper concludes that Australia and Japan have taken a traditional “security-first” approach to minilateralism. This stands in contrast to the more expansive approach pursued by Beijing, which focuses primarily on geoeconomics along with China’s broader goal of becoming a global leader, which has potential implications for international order. This indicates a significant “mismatch” between the respective vectors along which Australia/Japan and China are pursuing competitive advantage, and underscores how Canberra and Tokyo will need to manage the “security/economic disconnect” in the region, questions to be examined further in the second Occasional Paper that follows.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the East-West Center.
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Extent
18 pages
Format
Article
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
Related To (URI)
Table of Contents
Rights
In Copyright
Rights Holder
Catalog Record
Local Contexts
Collections
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.