High School ESLL Teachers' Understanding, Attitudes, and Implementation of the Whole Language Philosophy

dc.contributor.advisorDay, Richard
dc.contributor.authorLee, Janice
dc.contributor.departmentEducation
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-15T19:22:59Z
dc.date.available2014-01-15T19:22:59Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-15
dc.description.abstractThis study examined eighteen high school ESLL teachers' understanding, attitudes, and implementation of the whole language philosophy. The data gathered from a survey suggest that the teachers were generally aware of and had attitudes that supported the whole language philosophy. The third objective, implementation of whole language philosophy, did not prove to be as supportive as the other two objectives. Because whole language is a philosophy that drives classroom practices, it is difficult to provide an exact profile of what a whole language teacher looks like. However, the teachers who participated in this study were not "wholly" whole language teachers. Instead, they were integrating some whole language principles to other teaching/learning approaches. The teachers generally had three misconceptions and they were: 1) Teachers construct meaning for the students; 2) Assessment for whole language teachers objective and simple; 3) Some teachers believed that if they follow some of the whole language principles, then they were whole language teachers.
dc.format.extentiv, 95 pages
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10125/31487
dc.publisherUniversity of Hawaii at Manoa
dc.rightsAll UHM Honors Projects are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.
dc.titleHigh School ESLL Teachers' Understanding, Attitudes, and Implementation of the Whole Language Philosophy
dc.typeTerm Project
dc.type.dcmiText

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
education5003.PDF
Size:
2.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format