Evaluating Musculoskeletal Anatomy Knowledge Among First-Year Medical Students: A Longitudinal Analysis
| dc.creator | Snyder, Eli | |
| dc.creator | Sonnleitner, Mikayla | |
| dc.creator | Johnson, Franchesca A. | |
| dc.creator | Lee, Ho Hyun | |
| dc.creator | Lew, William | |
| dc.creator | Shimoda, Brent | |
| dc.creator | Aytaç, Güneş | |
| dc.creator | Stickley, Christopher | |
| dc.creator | Oshiro, Elliott | |
| dc.creator | Nishimura, Stephanie | |
| dc.creator | Lew, Henry | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-24T20:56:22Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-24T20:56:22Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Several studies have highlighted insufficient musculoskeletal (MSK) anatomy knowledge among medical students and residents. The current study evaluated MSK anatomy examination scores between successive cohorts of first-year medical students to compare three interventions: (A) a teaching-assistant-led pre-examination review session; (B) a clinical skills teaching session of the knee and shoulder joints, which was reinforced during anatomy dissection sessions, and (C) a combination of interventions (A) and (B). Methods: Intervention A was administered to cohort A (Class of 2025) during their first year of medical school. Intervention B was administered to cohort B (Class of 2026) during their first year of medical school. Intervention C was provided to cohort C (Class of 2027) during their first year of medical school. Outcome measures included (1) scores from a 30-question multiple-choice anatomy final examination, and (2) scores from 10 of the 30 questions that were related to the clinical skills teaching session. Results: Data from all members of each class of 77 students were captured (n = 231) and outliers (data points outside 1.5 times the IQR from the lower and upper quartiles) from each class were removed for analyses. Results showed (1) cohort C scored 3.3% higher than cohort B (p < 0.05) on all 30 questions and (2) cohort C scored 5.1% better than cohort B (p < 0.05) and 5.0% higher than the cohort A (p < 0.05) on the 10 questions related to the clinical skills teaching session. No other comparisons yielded significant results. Discussion: The significantly higher MSK anatomy examination scores in cohort C suggested that a combination of pre-exam review sessions with clinical skills teaching sessions (intervention C) enhanced students' knowledge of MSK anatomy more effectively than intervention A or intervention B alone. Longitudinal assessments and similar research at other institutions may further elucidate the differential effects of clinical skills teaching and pre-examination review sessions on medical students’ MSK anatomy knowledge. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10125/110256 | |
| dc.rights | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
| dc.title | Evaluating Musculoskeletal Anatomy Knowledge Among First-Year Medical Students: A Longitudinal Analysis | |
| dcterms.type | Text |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Evaluating Musculoskeletal Anatomy Knowledge Among First-Year Medical Students_ A Longitudinal Analysis - William Lew.pdf
- Size:
- 344.09 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.73 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description:
