Lessons from an Intersecting Trilogy

dc.contributor.authorCamille A. Nelson
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T17:28:34Z
dc.date.available2020-09-30T17:28:34Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.description.abstractThis Article will explore the case of Snyder v. Louisiana17 as an example of the low threshold established by some jurisdictions that apply the Batson test. By allowing for pretext, inconsistent excuses, and flimsy explanations from prosecutors, many courts have essentially inoculated prosecutors from the rigorous potential of the Batson decision.
dc.format.extent38 pages
dc.identifier.citationCamille A. Nelson, Batson, O.J., and Snyder: Lessons from an Intersecting Trilogy, 93 IOWA L. REV. 1687 (2008).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10125/69995
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherIowa Law Review
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCamille Nelson
dc.titleLessons from an Intersecting Trilogy
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.dcmiText
prism.endingpage1724
prism.startingpage1687

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
93IowaLRev.pdf
Size:
1.63 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format