Lessons from an Intersecting Trilogy

dc.contributor.author Camille A. Nelson
dc.date.accessioned 2020-09-30T17:28:34Z
dc.date.available 2020-09-30T17:28:34Z
dc.date.issued 2008
dc.description.abstract This Article will explore the case of Snyder v. Louisiana17 as an example of the low threshold established by some jurisdictions that apply the Batson test. By allowing for pretext, inconsistent excuses, and flimsy explanations from prosecutors, many courts have essentially inoculated prosecutors from the rigorous potential of the Batson decision.
dc.format.extent 38 pages
dc.identifier.citation Camille A. Nelson, Batson, O.J., and Snyder: Lessons from an Intersecting Trilogy, 93 IOWA L. REV. 1687 (2008).
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10125/69995
dc.language.iso English
dc.publisher Iowa Law Review
dc.relation.ispartofseries Camille Nelson
dc.title Lessons from an Intersecting Trilogy
dc.type Article
dc.type.dcmi Text
prism.endingpage 1724
prism.startingpage 1687
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
1.63 MB
Adobe Portable Document Format