Improving communication and collaboration in a DNP program through the use of technology: Enhancing student and faculty experience through technology-based clinical evaluations
Loading...
Date
Authors
Contributor
Advisor
Editor
Performer
Department
Instructor
Depositor
Speaker
Researcher
Consultant
Interviewer
Interviewee
Narrator
Transcriber
Annotator
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Journal Name
Volume
Number/Issue
Starting Page
Ending Page
Alternative Title
Abstract
Problem Statement: Submitting clinical evaluation forms has relied upon hard copy paper forms, resulting in inefficiencies in completing these important documents, and causing delays in submissions. A technology-based solution to address this issue may contribute to decreased time expended on this process for both students and faculty, and overcome some of the most frequently encountered challenges related to timely submission of paper evaluation forms. Purpose: The purpose of this project was to develop a streamlined process for submitting clinical evaluations on the UH Kuali Build platform. Methods: The UH Kuali Build evaluation forms were developed and piloted with eligible participants. A pre-questionnaire survey and a post-questionnaire survey were designed to evaluate the effectiveness and user-friendliness of the platform. Results: A total of 35 participants volunteered to participate. The mean difference in scores from pre-implementation to post-implementation Likert-type questions increased by 2.01, 1.66, 1.74, 1.9, 2.3, and 2.26 from questions one to six, respectively. The mode increased from 2 in the pre-implementation questions to 5 in the post-implementation questions. The mean and mode increases indicate that the Kuali Build forms improve user workflow and are recommended over the current paper-based forms. Qualitative data revealed that, on average, participants took one minute to complete the Kuali Build evaluation forms, compared to 10 minutes for the current paper-based evaluation forms. Discussion Results indicate that the Kuai Build forms enhance participants’ workflow and efficiency during the clinical evaluation submission process. Overall results suggest that users accept and are more willing to utilize the Kuali Build evaluation forms compared to the current paper-based evaluation forms. The project demonstrated how technology can be applied to improve the efficiency of the clinical evaluation process, ultimately saving time and effort for both DNP students and faculty.
Description
Citation
DOI
Extent
43 pages
Format
Type
Thesis
Text
Text
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
Related To (URI)
Table of Contents
Rights
All UHM dissertations and theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.
Rights Holder
Catalog Record
Local Contexts
Collections
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
