Fox in the Henhouse: The Delegation of Regulatory and Privacy Enforcement to Big Tech

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Contributor

Advisor

Editor

Performer

Department

Instructor

Depositor

Speaker

Researcher

Consultant

Interviewer

Interviewee

Narrator

Transcriber

Annotator

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Journal Name

Volume

Number/Issue

Starting Page

Ending Page

Alternative Title

Abstract

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has ordered tech giants to police the app developers that use their platforms, requiring them to remove apps that employ deceitful sales tactics or violate consumer privacy. Tech giants have often resisted FTC orders to police the companies on their platforms because policing takes significant resources and diminishes profits. But some firms, after paying modest fines for neglecting enforcement, have eventually complied with FTC demands, removing predatory apps and banning problematic developers. Other firms have continued to shirk enforcement obligations at the risk of escalating fines. What accounts for the differences? Using process tracing to track decisions by Apple and Facebook, we find that tech giants willingly police consumer fraud but not consumer privacy violations. Failures to police fraud leads to public complaints and negative press attention, while failures to police data breaches often go undetected by consumers, the media, and thus the FTC.

Description

Citation

Extent

10 pages

Format

Type

Geographic Location

Time Period

Related To

Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Related To (URI)

Table of Contents

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Rights Holder

Catalog Record

Local Contexts

Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.