Mixed evidence of a Moral Mind Heuristic in Zero-History HRI: The (Unstable) Concomitance of Mind, Morality, and Trust Judgments

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBanks, Jaime
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-26T18:36:17Z
dc.date.available2023-12-26T18:36:17Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-03
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2024.073
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-9981331-7-1
dc.identifier.otherd5f35c49-6e7c-4eb1-8576-e78ee75cfd35
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10125/106448
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the 57th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectHuman‒Robot Interactions
dc.subjectcognitive heuristic
dc.subjectsocial distance
dc.subjectsocial robots
dc.subjecttheory of mind
dc.subjecttrustworthiness
dc.titleMixed evidence of a Moral Mind Heuristic in Zero-History HRI: The (Unstable) Concomitance of Mind, Morality, and Trust Judgments
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.type.dcmiText
dcterms.abstractExtant research offers piecemeal evidence of the operation of a moral mind heuristic (MMH)—a shorthanded judgment in which covarying mental, moral, and trustworthiness judgments emerge under zero-history, morally neutral exposures to humanoid robots. Three criteria must be met for such an operation: Concomitance (unordered co-activation of judgments), varied accessibility (salience can be primed), and biasing effects (drives more positive perceptions). Study 1 confirms concomitance. Study 2 confirms accessibility and effects. Study 3 replicates Study 2 an in-person robot exposure, however the MMH construct became unstable.
dcterms.extent10 pages
prism.startingpage600

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
0059.pdf
Size:
479.03 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Human-Robot Interactions