Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/9725

A study of selected respone aberrance indices as alternatives to the standard error of measurement in interpreting individual text scores: y Judy A. Shishido

File Description Size Format  
uhm_phd_9129703_r.pdf Version for non-UH users. Copying/Printing is not permitted 3.52 MB Adobe PDF View/Open
uhm_phd_9129703_uh.pdf Version for UH users 3.48 MB Adobe PDF View/Open

Item Summary

dc.contributor.author Shishido, Judy A.
dc.date.accessioned 2009-07-15T17:41:42Z
dc.date.available 2009-07-15T17:41:42Z
dc.date.issued 1991
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10125/9725
dc.description Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1991.
dc.description Includes bibliographical references (leaves 126-136)
dc.description Microfiche.
dc.description x, 136 leaves, bound ill. 29 cm
dc.description.abstract The purpose of this study was to discover any relationships between three aberrant test response indices, the Modified Caution Index (MCI), the Person Average R (PAR),and the item-response theory-based standardized logistic maximum likelihood function (Z3); and four hypothesized reasons for aberrant response patterns, curricular differences, differences in test-taking skills, differences in motivation, and differences in consistency of academic performance. Two secondary purposes of this study were to evaluate the effectiveness of the aberrance indices as aids in interpreting test scores, and to investigate the occurrence of sandbagging on a placement test. Data from the University of Hawaii at Manoa's Japanese Language Placement Test was used, along with survey data obtained from students taking the Placement Test, students enrolled in UH Manoa Japanese language courses, Hawaii high school Japanese language teachers, and UH Manoa Japanese language instructors. Relationships were found between MCI and PAR and curricular differences and differences in consistency of academic performance, and between all three indices and differences in motivation. It was estimated that between four and ten percent of test takers engaged in sand bagging on the Placement Test The use of either MCI or PAR was recommended as aids in interpreting Placement Test scores.
dc.language.iso en-US
dc.relation Theses for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (University of Hawaii at Manoa). Educational Psychology; no. 2619
dc.rights All UHM dissertations and theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.
dc.subject Educational tests and measurements -- Evaluation
dc.title A study of selected respone aberrance indices as alternatives to the standard error of measurement in interpreting individual text scores: y Judy A. Shishido
dc.type Thesis
dc.type.dcmi Text
Appears in Collections: Ph.D. - Educational Psychology


Please email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.

Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.