Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Cardiorespiratory responses to slight expiratory resistive loading during strenuous exercise at sea level
|uhm_phd_9532588_r.pdf||Version for non-UH users. Copying/Printing is not permitted||2.42 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|uhm_phd_9532588_uh.pdf||Version for UH users||2.38 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|Title:||Cardiorespiratory responses to slight expiratory resistive loading during strenuous exercise at sea level|
|Authors:||Fee, Larry L.|
|Keywords:||Exercise -- Physiological aspects|
Respiration -- Physiological aspects
|Abstract:||At sea level we determined the cardiorespiratory and performance effects of a slight expiratory resistive load (ERL) which, at mild altitude, had been effective in mitigating exercise-induced hypoxemia (EIH). Paired VO2max bicycle ergometer tests, (ERL vs control) were performed by 28 highly-fit (VO2max = 63.4 ±. 1.36) athletes (age = 33.5 ± 7.3). There was significant EIH in both control and ERL tests at 75, 80, 85. and 90% maximum power output (POmax) and at VO2max when compared to resting SaO2; but no difference in SaO2 between control and ERL at any level of intensity. Peak-expiratory mouth pressures (Pao) were greater (p≤0.05) with ERL at 75, 80, 85, 90 % POmax and VO2max: with ERL, Pao was increased compared to control by 0.20, 0.35, 0.41, 0.49, and 0.73 cm H2O, respectively. Concomitantly, minute ventilation (VE) was greater with ERL vs control (p≤0.05) by 4.1, 4.9, 4.5, and 5.8 L min^-1 at 80, 85, 90 % POmax and VO2max. The increase in VE was largely due to a trend toward increased tidal volume (.1 ml = 121, 198, 154, and 103, from 75 to 90 % POmax). There was a small, non-significant increase in VO2 (averaging 3.0 ml kg^-1-sec^-1) with ERL from 75-90 % POmax. With ERL, heart rate (HR) was consistently lower (≥ 2.0 BPM) throughout, although not significantly so. However, O2 pulse (VO2/ HR) was significantly greater with ERL by 9.5, 9.0, 7.9, 7.1 and 7.0 % at 75, 80, 85, 90 % POmax and V02max. With ERL, athletes attained greater (p ≤ 0.05) POmax 352.0 ±. 9.9 vs 345.7 ±. 9.5 watts, and higher (p ≤ 0.05) VO2max = 63.4 ±. 1.36 vs 60.3 ±. 1.26 ml kg^-l min^-1. Subsequently, in a subset (n =12), FRC was determined by He-dilution during steady-state 75 % POmax. With ERL, Pao VE, and VT/Te were greater (p<0.05) and FRC was elevated (p≤0.05) 0.67 ±. 0.29 L. End-inspiratory lung volume (EILV) with ERL was greater than control (p≤0.05), 82.2 ±. 1.1 vs 72.5 ±. 1.3 % of TLC, respectively. We conclude that during heavy to intense exercise, surprisingly small ERL (ranging from 1.27 to 2.94 cm H2O) may cause VT to increase and FRG to shift upward, reducing the potential for air flow limitation. That O2 pulse was higher with ERL at workloads identical to that of control, would suggest that venous return was augmented, perhaps in response to reduced pulmonary vascular resistance associated with increased FRG. The significantly improved VO2max with ERL may be due in part to the increased inspiratory work of breathing that exercising at elevated FRCs may entail; however, it would appear that some fraction of the increased VO2max observed with ERL was delivered to the working skeletal muscle which produced significantly greater POmax. We conclude that during strenuous exercise, slight expiratory resistive loading enhances performance in highly-trained athletes.|
|Description:||Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1995.|
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 96-106).
xxii, 106 leaves, bound 29 cm
|Rights:||All UHM dissertations and theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.|
|Appears in Collections:||
Ph.D. - Biomedical Sciences (Physiology)|
Please email email@example.com if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.