Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Contagion or competitive effects?: Lenders’ response to peer firm cyberattacks
|Title:||Contagion or competitive effects?: Lenders’ response to peer firm cyberattacks|
show 1 moretechnology
|Abstract:||This study examines whether and when cybersecurity events of peer firms in an industry influence the cost of private debt for other firms in the industry. If lenders adjust expectations about industry-wide cyber risk based on peer cyberattacks, a contagion effect likely exists whereby non-breached borrowers face higher loan spreads. If, however, lenders view cyberattacks as idiosyncratic risks, a competitive effect may dominate whereby non-breached borrowers benefit through reductions in loan spreads. Unlike other firm-specific events (i.e., bankruptcies, restatements) shown to have contagion effects in determining a firm’s cost of debt, the results provide evidence of competitive effects for cybersecurity events. These effects are more pronounced for non-term and shorter duration loans, and for industries with high growth and low leverage. Collectively, the evidence suggests cyberattacks provide firm-specific information to lenders and competitors benefit from this intra-industry information transfer.|
|Appears in Collections:||
13 Financial Accounting 7: Debt market research (including credit ratings/Debt contracts) (FAR7)|
Please email firstname.lastname@example.org if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.