Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Comparison of Species Identification Methods: DNA Barcoding versus Morphological Taxonomy

File Size Format  
2016-Friedheim-Sophie.pdf 3.14 MB Adobe PDF View/Open

Item Summary

Title:Comparison of Species
Identification Methods: DNA Barcoding versus Morphological Taxonomy
Authors:Friedheim, Sophie
Date Issued:21 Oct 2016
Abstract:In the field of biological sciences, there are several methods of species identification that are commonly used today. The purpose of this paper is to analyze two of the most popular methods, morphological taxonomy and DNA species barcoding, and to determine which is the most accurate method. DNA Barcoding uses molecular information to classify species, whereas morphological taxonomy uses morphology, and phenotypic characteristics to distinguish between one species and another. It is of great concern to traditional morphological taxonomists that DNA species identification is taking the place of morphological taxonomy, and that this genomic method is not adequate enough to properly do so. To help the spread information regarding species identification, and to reduce the discrepancies within the evolutionary biology community, it is essential that there is a globally accepted method of species identification. Throughout this paper, we address to positives and negatives of both methods, and find that where one method lacks, the other makes up for it. In the conclusion, we suggests that both methods should be used in unison to provide the most efficient, effective, and accurate species identification.
Appears in Collections: Horizons, Volume 1

Please email if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.

Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.