Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
The Status of Subject and Object Pronominal Elements in Lukunosh Mortlockese
|Title:||The Status of Subject and Object Pronominal Elements in Lukunosh Mortlockese|
|Date Issued:||01 Apr 2013|
|Publisher:||University of Hawai'i at Mānoa Department of Linguistics|
|Citation:||Odango, Emerson. 2013. The Status of Subject and Object Pronominal Elements in Lukunosh Mortlockese. University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Working Papers in Linguistics 44(4).|
|Series:||University of Hawai‘I at Mānoa Working Papers in Linguistics|
|Abstract:||Subject and object pronominal elements go by a variety of names in the literature of Oceanic languages. Few authors, however, clarify the morphophonological and morphosyntactic status of such elements. This paper investigates the status of subject markers and object markers in the Lukunosh dialect of Mortlockese, a minority language spoken in the Federated States of Micronesia. Through the application of morphophonological and morphosyntactic tests established in the literature, I conclude that: (1) subject markers are proclitics that have ambiguous interpretation as either anaphoric agreement (arguments) or grammatical agreement, and (2) object markers are suffixes that show a split: (a) the third-person singular object marker behaves like a general transitivity marker when there is an overt object, and (b) both the third-person singular object marker and the other non-third-person singular object markers behave like anaphoric agreement when there is no overt object.|
|Rights:||Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License|
|Appears in Collections:||
Working Papers in Linguistics - 2013|
Please email firstname.lastname@example.org if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.