Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Eastern Polynesian: The Linguistic Evidence Revisited
|Title:||Eastern Polynesian: The Linguistic Evidence Revisited|
|Date Issued:||01 Dec 2012|
|Publisher:||University of Hawai'i at Mānoa Department of Linguistics|
|Citation:||Walworth, Mary. 2012. Eastern Polynesian: The Linguistic Evidence Revisited. University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Working Papers in Linguistics 43(5).|
|Series:||University of Hawai‘I at Mānoa Working Papers in Linguistics|
|Abstract:||For the past forty years, historical linguistics and archaeology have provided seemingly mutually corroboratory evidence for the settlement of east Polynesia. However, recent findings in archaeology have shifted this relationship out of balance, calling previous conclusions into question.1 This paper first reviews the generally accepted archaeological and linguistic theories of east Polynesia's settlement, then describes the new archaeological findings, highlighting the areas where the evidence from the two disciplines is discordant. In sections four and five, I analyze the linguistic data from Eastern Polynesian languages that show lack of support for the Tahitic and Marquesic subgroups, and propose a new, contact-based model for the region. The new linguistic model, in conjunction with archaeology, ultimately demonstrates that the settlement of east Polynesia and the development of Eastern Polynesian languages occurred in one major dispersal and subsequent spheres of contact, producing the pattern of cultural and linguistic traits we see today.|
|Rights:||Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License|
|Appears in Collections:||
Working Papers in Linguistics - 2012|
Please email firstname.lastname@example.org if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.