Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Efforts at control of the Argentine ant in Haleakala National Park, Maui, Hawaii
|Title:||Efforts at control of the Argentine ant in Haleakala National Park, Maui, Hawaii|
|Authors:||Krushelnycky, Paul D.|
Reimer, Neil J.
|LC Subject Headings:||Argentine ant -- Control -- Hawaii -- Maui.|
Haleakala National Park (Hawaii)
Insect baits and repellents -- Testing -- Hawaii -- Maui.
|Issue Date:||Dec 1996|
|Publisher:||Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Botany|
|Citation:||Krushelnycky PD, Reimer NJ. 1996. Efforts at control of the Argentine ant in Haleakala National Park, Maui, Hawaii. Honolulu (HI): Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Botany. PCSU Technical Report, 109.|
|Series/Report no.:||Technical Report|
|Abstract:||The Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Mayr), has proven to be a threat to native arthropod species in Haleakala National Park, and is also a potential threat to the park's native flora. As it continues to expand its range, an effort has been undertaken to eradicate it, or at the least, control its spread. During a year-long bait preference test implemented at each of the ant's two infestation sites, the commercially available Maxforce granular ant bait from the Clorox Corporation was found to be the most attractive and feasible bait for large scale control. Subsequently Maxforce, which is formulated with 0.9% hydramethylnon, was used in test plots to determine the efficacy of the bait in the field. Initially, Maxforce was tested at two application rates: broadcast at 2 lbs/acre and 4 lbs/acre. Later, the following treatments were also tested: a Maxforce and honey granule mix, Maxforce with 0.5% hydramethylnon, Maxforce with a different solvent, Maxforce distributed in exposed piles, and Maxforce distributed in covered piles. While there were significant differences in the magnitude of ant reduction among the various treatments, all yielded the same general result. Foraging ant numbers at monitoring bait stations declined an average maximum of 97.0% in the test plots, with no plots achieving 100% reduction. At two months post treatment the average number of foraging ants was still reduced by 92.1%. Nest survival in the plots was impacted to a lesser degree, and was difficult to measure accurately due to the occurrence of nest movement. Nevertheless, data showed no significant differences in the rates of nest survival between the treatments after two months. A second identical application in plots treated with Maxforce at 2 and 4 lbs/acre did not result in eradication. Bait attractiveness and a small window of foraging opportunity were judged to be the main obstacles in achieving total eradication. The next step in Argentine ant investigations at Haleakala should test the effectiveness of treating range margins with Maxforce for preventing or slowing range expansion.|
|Description:||Reports were scanned in black and white at a resolution of 600 dots per inch and were converted to text using Adobe Paper Capture Plug-in.|
|Appears in Collections:||The PCSU and HPI-CESU Technical Reports 1974 - current|
Please contact email@example.com if you need this content in an alternative format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.