Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Are Review Helpfulness Score and Review Unhelpfulness Score Two Sides of The Same Coin or Different Coins?

File Size Format  
0635.pdf 436.97 kB Adobe PDF View/Open

Item Summary

Title:Are Review Helpfulness Score and Review Unhelpfulness Score Two Sides of The Same Coin or Different Coins?
Authors:Khern-Am-Nuai, Warut
Yu, Yinan
Keywords:Strategy, Information, Technology, Economics, and Society (SITES)
peer evaluation
review helpfulness
review unhelpfulness
Date Issued:05 Jan 2021
Abstract:Online review platforms have increasingly incorporated the review evaluating system (i.e., a system that allows users to evaluate whether reviews are helpful/unhelpful) to assist review readers and encourage review contributors. However, although we have extensive knowledge about the review helpfulness score, our insights regarding its counterpart, the review unhelpfulness score, are lacking. Addressing this limitation is important because many researchers have adopted the review unhelpfulness score assuming that it is driven by intrinsic review characteristics while practitioners also implicitly assume that the unhelpfulness score can identify low-quality reviews. The primary objective of this work is to verify whether the review unhelpfulness score is influenced by intrinsic review characteristics that drive review helpfulness score. We find that unlike review helpfulness score, unhelpfulness score is not driven by intrinsic review characteristics, and that helpfulness voters behave significantly different than unhelpfulness voters. Further implications and future directions are also discussed.
Pages/Duration:10 pages
Rights:Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Appears in Collections: Strategy, Information, Technology, Economics, and Society (SITES)

Please email if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons