Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/70707

Comparison of Voluntary versus Mandatory Vaccine Discussions in Online Health Communities: A Text Analytics Approach

File Size Format  
0078.pdf 522.03 kB Adobe PDF View/Open

Item Summary

Title:Comparison of Voluntary versus Mandatory Vaccine Discussions in Online Health Communities: A Text Analytics Approach
Authors:Alazazi, Massara
Wang, Bin
Keywords:Text Analytics
content analysis
mandatory vaccines
online health communities
topic modeling
show 1 morevoluntary vaccines
show less
Date Issued:05 Jan 2021
Abstract:Vaccines are vital health interventions. However, they are controversial and some people support them while others reject them. Social media discussion and big data are a rich source to understand people’s insights about different vaccines and the related topics that concern most of them. This study aims to explore the online discussions about mandatory and voluntary vaccines using text analysis techniques. Reddit social platform is popular in online health discussion and thus data from Reddit is analyzed. The results show that different aspects are discussed for different types of vaccines. The discussion of mandatory vaccines is more interactive and is focused on the risks associated with them. Voluntary vaccines’ discussion is focused on their effectiveness and whether to get them or not. The study have important implications for health agencies and researchers as well as for healthcare providers and caregivers.
Pages/Duration:10 pages
URI:http://hdl.handle.net/10125/70707
ISBN:978-0-9981331-4-0
DOI:10.24251/HICSS.2021.096
Rights:Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Appears in Collections: Text Analytics


Please email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons